Appeal No. 2002-1545 Page 16 Application No. 08/949,757 2-deoxy-glucose and rhamnose, and also comprises glucose and 2-acetamido-2- deoxy-glucose (galactosamine). Appellants argue that Aluyi describes the chromatographic analysis of total sugar content for seventy strains of viridans streptococci, and thus do not describe an isolated antigen. Appellants argue further that Aluyi describes strains of viridans-group streptococci, which does not include the enterococci. See Appeal Brief, page 16. We agree. The examiner responds by arguing that “the instantly claimed invention recites open language and would permit the presence of other sources of carbohydrate antigen.” Examiner’s Answer, page 32. The examiner asserts further that “[t]he antigen of Aluyi [ ] has the claimed sugars in the recited ratio and would inherently anticipate the claimed antigen.” Id. Again, we do not agree with the examiner’s interpretation that the claim reads on the presence of other sources of carbohydrate antigen for the reasons set forth supra with respect to the rejection over Pritchard. In addition, as we stated with respect to the rejection over Wessman, the claims are drawn to an isolated Enterococcus faecalis antigen, and in addition to containing the sugars in the claimed amounts, the antigen must be cross-reactive with antibodies raised to the antigen isolated from the deposited strain, as well as being consistent with the H1-NMR analyses of the antigen provided by the specification.Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007