Ex Parte GOLDMAN - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2002-1657                                                        
          Application No. 09/134,981                                                  

          which is fed to a sewing device for stitching the embroidery                
          design.                                                                     
               Claim 1 is illustrative of the invention and reads as follows:         
               1.  A system for automatically producing an embroidery                 
          design, the system comprising:                                              
               a) means for inputting an embroidery pattern into an image             
          data file, the image data file comprising a plurality of pixels,            
          each pixel comprising a bitmap representing a color;                        
               b) processing means operatively connected to said inputting            
          means for creating skeletal and edge contour data and storing said          
          image data file; and                                                        
               c) an embroidery data generating mechanism operatively                 
          connected to said processing means for labeling and interrelating           
          said skeletal and edge contour data and generating a complex                
          embroidery pattern directly from a scanned, color image.                    
               The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                        
          Futamura                      5,740,056           Apr. 14, 1998             
                                                                                     
               Claims 1-9 and 11-20, all of the appealed claims, stand                
          rejected 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Futamura.               
               Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellant and the               
          Examiner, reference is made to the Briefs1 and Answer for the               
          respective details.                                                         


               1 The Appeal Brief was filed August 20, 2001 (Paper No. 10).  In       
          response to the Examiner’s Answer dated October 2, 2001 (Paper No. 11), a   
          Reply Brief was filed January 29, 2002 (Paper No. 12), which was acknowledged
          and entered by the Examiner as indicated in the communication dated February
          19, 2002 (Paper No. 13).                                                    
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007