Ex Parte SUMNER - Page 1




              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
                                                                                      Paper No. 16            
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                                 ____________                                                 
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                    Ex parte TERENCE EDWARD SUMNER                                            
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                             Appeal No. 2002-1696                                             
                                           Application No. 08/921,884                                         
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                                   ON BRIEF                                                   
                                                 ____________                                                 
            Before JERRY SMITH, RUGGIERO, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.                            
            BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               


                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                
                   A patent examiner rejected claims 1-19.  The appellant appeals therefrom under             
            35 U.S.C. § 134(a).  We reverse.                                                                  


                                               BACKGROUND                                                     
                   The invention at issue on appeal "relates . . . to selective call messaging. . . ."        
            (Spec. at 1.)  Selective call messaging uses a selective address to deliver a message to          
            a single subscriber and a group message to deliver a message to a group of                        
            subscribers.  Group messaging is efficient for conveying data (e.g., reports on weather,          
            sports, or news) to many subscribers via a single transmission.  (Id.)  Because all               






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007