The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 20 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte STEPHEN V. BURAKOFF, SERGIU S. SIMMEL, and ROBERT A. FEIN ____________ Appeal No. 2002-1697 Application No. 09/023,039 ____________ ON BRIEF1 ____________ Before FLEMING, BARRY, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL A patent examiner rejected claims 1-24. The appellants appeal therefrom under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a). We reverse. BACKGROUND The invention at issue on appeal obtains consent to the electronic delivery of financial data required by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). The SEC requires that specific data about investments be delivered to investors. For example, a 1The appellants' request for an oral hearing, (Paper No. 18), was denied because it was submitted "almost a month" too late. (Paper No. 19.)Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007