Ex Parte ISENSEE et al - Page 8

          Appeal No. 2002-1771                                                        
          Application 09/204,914                                                      

               For the reasons stated above, we find that claim 1 is not              
          anticipated by Siefert.  The rejection of claims 1, 3-9, 11-17,             
          and 19-24 is reversed.                                                      
                                      REVERSED                                        







                         LEE E. BARRETT                )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              
                                                       )                              

                                                       ))  BOARD OF PATENT            
                         MICHAEL R. FLEMING            )     APPEALS                  
                         Administrative Patent Judge )       AND                      
                                                       )   INTERFERENCES              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                         MAHSHID D. SAADAT             )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge )                                















                                        - 8 -                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007