Ex Parte CLARKE et al - Page 6




          Appeal No. 2002-1812                                                        
          Application 08/861,181                                                      

          unit of work identifier (LUWID) (col. 10, lines 22-28; col. 12,             
          lines 5-9; col. 22, lines 54-57).                                           
               Britton is generally directed to a two-phase commit                    
          procedure, which is defined as follows (col. 92, line 56 to                 
          col. 93, line 5):                                                           
                    A procedure for coordinating and/or synchronizing a               
               commit or back out of updates and/or a protected                       
               conversation.  Usually, the two phase commit procedure is              
               used to atomically commit or back out a plurality of                   
               resources or a single resource via a protected conversation.           
               By way of example, the two phase commit procedure can                  
               include a polling or prepare phase and a back out or commit            
               phase.                                                                 
          After the phase one prepare-to-commit phase and before the phase            
          two decision to commit or backout, the resources to be changed              
          remain in a state of "in doubt" (col. 13, lines 14-21).                     
               The example of a "protected conversation" between                      
          application 56A and application 56D in Britton most closely                 
          corresponds to the claimed "message transfer across a                       
          transaction-oriented data processing network."  The protected               
          conversation is described at column 15, line 1 to column 18,                
          line 50, with respect to Figs. 5A and 5B, and the timing of the             
          commits is discussed at column 27, lines 1-36 with respect to               
          Fig. 9.  However, it is difficult to read Britton onto claim 1              
          because the unit of work in Britton involves an update to                   
          file 78D (col. 16, lines 18-21) in system 50D and to files 78A              
          and 78B (col. 16, lines 29-30) in system 50A, rather than                   

                                        - 6 -                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007