Ex Parte Cassel et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2002-1893                                                        
          Application No. 09/767,413                                                  


               Claim 1 is the only independent claim on appeal, and it                
          reads as follows:                                                           
                    1.   A combination breathing monitor alarm and audio              
               baby alarm comprising:                                                 
                    an attachable transmitter forming a main body of a                
               linearly elongated, pliable chest strap of a soft and                  
               formable material that is easily wrapable about the chest of           
               an infant; and                                                         
                    a receiver housing receiver control circuitry for                 
               receiving signals transmitted by said transmitter.                     
               The references relied on by the examiner are:                          
          Tao                      4,862,144                Aug.  29, 1989            
          O’Dwyer                  5,928,157                Jul.  27, 1999            
          Teodorescu et al. (Teodorescu)  6,011,477         Jan.   4, 2000            
               Claims 1, 2 and 4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as           
          being unpatentable over O’Dwyer.                                            
               Claims 3 and 6 through 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.               
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over O’Dwyer in view of                      
          Teodorescu.                                                                 
               Claim 5 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being              
          unpatentable over O’Dwyer in view of Tao.                                   
               Reference is made to the final rejection (paper number 6),             
          the brief (paper number 8) and the answer (paper number 9) for              
          the respective positions of the appellants and the examiner.                



                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007