Ex Parte BYRNE et al - Page 1




                      The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                 
                                publication and is not binding precedent of the Board                                
                             Paper No. 18                                                                            
                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                             ______________________                                                  
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                              AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                             ______________________                                                  
                                Ex parte DEBORA JEAN BYRNE and SHAW-BEN SHI                                          
                                             ______________________                                                  
                                               Appeal No. 2002-1894                                                  
                                             Application No. 09/195,870                                              
                                             ______________________                                                  
                                                     ON BRIEF                                                        
                                             ______________________                                                  

             Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.                                  
             HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                  

                                              DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     
             This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 29.                                      
                    The disclosed invention relates to the processing of sparse hierarchical access control list     
             (ACL) data stored in a relational database used as a backing store for a directory object.              
                    Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows:                       
                    1.  A method for processing sparse hierarchical ACL data stored in a                             
                    relational database used as a backing store for a directory service,                             
                    comprising the steps of:                                                                         


                                                         -1-                                                         





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007