Ex Parte YANG - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2002-1980                                                         
          Application 09/264,769                                                       


               a microphone connected by a wire to the mobile or cellular              
          telephone for receiving a first voice signal from a user and then            
          transmitting the first voice signal to the mobile or cellular                
          telephone;                                                                   
          a transmitter connected to the mobile or cellular telephone                  
          for receiving a second voice signal from the telephone and then              
          converting the second voice signal into a wireless signal so that            
          the wireless signal is broadcast by the transmitter, wherein the             
          transmitter can be an (sic, a) separated unit or a built-in unit             
          in the mobile or cellular telephone; and                                     
               a receiver earphone for picking up the wireless signal from             
          the transmitter and then converting the wireless signal into a               
          third voice signal for hearing by the user, wherein the                      
          transmitter and the receiver earphone are coupled in a wireless              
          manner, and the receiver earphone forms a stand-alone unit that              
          is not connected to the microphone.                                          
               The following references are relied on by the examiner:                 
          Ham                      5,552,708            Sep.  3, 1996                  
          Rydbeck                  5,590,417            Dec. 31, 1996                  
          Barkat et al. (Barkat)   5,805,672            Sep.  8, 1998                  
          Core et al. (Core)       5,826,187            Oct. 20, 1998                  

               All claims on appeal, claims 1-40, stand rejected under                 
          35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies            
          upon Rydbeck in view of Ham as to claims 1, 4, 5, 8-11, 13,                  
          22-33 and 35-40 in the first stated rejection, with the addition             
          of Barkat as to claims 2, 3, 6 and 7.  The remaining claims on               
          appeal, claims 12, 14-21 and 34 are considered obvious by the                
          examiner in light of Rydbeck in view of Ham, further in view of              
          Core.                                                                        


                                          2                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007