Ex Parte MECHE - Page 6



           Appeal No. 2002-2000                                                                   
           Application No. 08/933,911                                                             

           these commands may be implemented obviously would have been                            
           effected according to the use of the prefix according to Lee.  The                     
           function of this prefix is to identify a foreign mobile subscriber                     
           within a local network, which is the same effective function                           
           achieved by the teaching value of Reininghaus.  Obviously, within                      
           35 U.S.C. § 103, since the actual coding is not discussed in                           
           Reininghaus, the manner in which the functionality of the transfer                     
           of the control information from one home register HLRA to a new                        
           home register HLRB in different mobile radio regions would have                        
           been effected in Reininghaus by the use of the prefixing approach                      
           taught in Lee.  In this manner, the claimed identifier of claims 1,                    
           2, 4, 5, 7 and 8 would have been obvious in light of the collective                    
           teachings and suggestions of both references.  The teaching value                      
           of both references is considered consistent when it is taught in                       
           the paragraph bridging column 8 and 9 that mobile radio regions MFA                    
           and MFB in Reininghaus may be countries or continents, which is                        
           consistent with the examples of Australian and Germany given in                        
           Lee.                                                                                   
                 The prefixes in Lee are shown in Figures 8, 9, 10A and 10B,                      
           with the new prefix identifier shown in Figures 9 of Lee.  Thus,                       
           the subject matter in dependent claims 2 and 5 would have been                         

                                                6                                                 




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007