The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board Paper No. 12 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte LANCE R. CARLSON, JEFFREY L. WHALEY and ROBERT L. METZ ______________ Appeal No. 2002-2009 Application 09/843,631 _______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judges. THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner's final rejection of claims 47-67. The language in dispute common to independent claims 47 (and its dependent claims 48-62), 63, 64 and 65 relates to the following feature of these claims: 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007