Ex Parte Carlson et al - Page 1



               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
                    today was not written for publication and is                      
                         not binding precedent of the Board                           
                                                       Paper No. 12                   
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                    _______________                                   
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                         
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                    _______________                                   
                               Ex parte LANCE R. CARLSON,                             
                         JEFFREY L. WHALEY and ROBERT L. METZ                         
                                     ______________                                   
                                   Appeal No. 2002-2009                               
                              Application 09/843,631                                  
                                    _______________                                   
                              ON BRIEF                                                
                                    _______________                                   
          Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judges.         
          THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        
                                                                                     

                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                 
               Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner's              
          final rejection of claims 47-67.                                            
               The language in dispute common to independent claims 47                
          (and its dependent claims 48-62), 63, 64 and 65 relates to the              
          following feature of these claims:                                          



                                          1                                           




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007