Ex Parte NOGUCHI et al - Page 4




                Appeal No. 2002-2012                                                                                                         
                Application No. 08/953,707                                                                                                   



                                 Torres does not teach or suggest automatically resizing text describing the                                 
                        displayed program to fit in a fixed sized window on the display and that the                                         
                        resizing of the text is dictated by the amount of text.  Instead, Torres teaches that                                
                        character sizes are adjusted for a change in window size.  This, however, is not                                     
                        resizing text for a fixed sized window.  Because Torres does not teach resizing                                      
                        text for a fixed sized window, Torres cannot teach resizing of text dictated by the                                  
                        amount of the text as recited in claim 26.                                                                           
                        The examiner responds to appellants’ arguments on page 6 of the answer.  The                                         
                examiner argues:                                                                                                             
                                 The fact that Torres teaches the ability to adjust the screen size is a more                                
                        advanced feature shown by Torres, in addition to fully disclosing the Applicant’s                                    
                        claimed feature.  It should be noted that the “text fitting” in Torres is done, not                                  
                        while varying the size, but to a fixed window. Once the user decides on a display                                    
                        size, the display remains FIXED, as the font size for the characters is calculated                                   
                        with respect to the amount of available pixels in the display.  This is all that is                                  
                        claimed and is sufficiently shown by Torres.                                                                         
                        We do not agree with the examiner’s interpretation of the claims and                                                 
                characterization of the reference.  Claims will be given their broadest reasonable                                           
                interpretation consistent with the specification, limitations appearing in the specification                                 
                will not be read into the claims.  In re Etter 756 F.2d 852, 858, 225 USPQ 1, 5 (Fed.                                        
                Cir. 1985).  In analyzing the scope of the claim, office personnel must rely on the                                          
                appellant’s disclosure to properly determine the meaning of the terms used in the                                            
                claims.  Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 52 F.3d 967, 980, 34 USPQ2d                                                  
                1321, 1330 (Fed. Cir. 1995). “[I]nterpreting what is meant by a word in a claim ‘is not to                                   
                be confused with adding an extraneous limitation appearing in the specification, which is                                    
                improper.’” (emphasis original) In re Cruciferous Sprout Litigation, 301 F.3d 1343,                                          


                                                                    -4-                                                                      



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007