Appeal No. 2002-2041 Application No. 09/764,658 stepsize, a second prediction step, for predicting the quantization stepsize which is used to code said bitstream according to a predetermined target bit rate, and a final control step, for adjusting the stepsize with respect to said target bit rate, said method including between the analysis and prediction steps of one iteration, a picture re-arrangement step for rearranging an order of the picture sequence. The examiner relies on the following reference: Legall 5,878,166 Mar. 2, 1999 Claims 1-5, 8 and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as anticipated by Legall. Reference is made to the brief and answer for the respective positions of appellants and the examiner. OPINION An anticipatory reference is one which describes all of the elements of the claimed invention so as to have placed a person of ordinary skill in the art in possession thereof. In re Spada, 911 F.2d 205, 15 USPQ2d 1655 (Fed. Cir. 1990). We will not sustain the rejection of claims 1-5, 8 and 9 because, in our view, the examiner has failed to identify, in Legall, each and every claimed element. Both independent claims 1 and 9 recite a picture re- arrangement step or operation for rearranging an order of the -2–Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007