Appeal No. 2002-2045
Application No. 08/874,005
to make the modification proposed by the examiner [brief, pages
11-12]. The examiner responds that Horimoto suggests that the
techniques disclosed therein can be applied to other
communication devices [answer, pages 7-8].
We will not sustain the examiner’s rejection of claims 8
and 15 for essentially the reasons argued by appellant in the
briefs. The examiner’s position that the same processor used by
Heidari could be used in Horimoto fails to address the
obviousness of using the claimed digitized wireless transmission
compression scheme. As discussed above, the examiner has failed
to rebut appellant’s argument that neither reference teaches use
of a digitized wireless transmission compression scheme.
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007