The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 14 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte CARY LEE BATES and PAUL REUBEN DAY ____________ Appeal No. 2002-2053 Application No. 09/329,135 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before THOMAS, BARRY, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges. LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 2, 8, 9, 11, 19, 21, 22, 28, 29, 31, 36, 38-41, 47-50, 52, and 60. Claims 3-7, 10, 12-18, 20, 23-27, 30, 32-35, 37, 42-46, 51, 53-59, and 61 have been indicated as allowable if rewritten in independent form (final rejection, page 5).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007