The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 13 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JONATHAN C. RICKER ____________ Appeal No. 2002-2143 Application No. 09/482,038 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before ABRAMS, MCQUADE and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. MCQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Jonathan C. Ricker appeals from the final rejection of claims 21 through 38, all of the claims pending in the application. THE INVENTION The invention relates to a multi-axis turbine for harnessing wind energy. Representative claim 21 reads as follows:1 21. A multiaxis turbine, comprising: 1 In the event of further prosecution, the lack of proper antecedent basis for the terms “the vibration absorbing means” in claim 28 and “the bearing” in claim 32 should be corrected.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007