Appeal No. 2002-2149
Application No. 08/807,096
Each of independent claims 6, 18, and 20 contains limitations similar to those in
claim 1 for which the rejection is deficient. We cannot sustain the rejection of claims 1,
3-6, 8-18, 20, and 21 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Khenson and
Harding.
CONCLUSION
The rejection of claims 1, 3-6, 8-18, 20, and 21 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is
reversed.
REVERSED
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
MAHSHID D. SAADAT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
-5-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007