Ex Parte RAITH et al - Page 1




              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                            
                     publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                             
                                                                                           Paper No. 36                 
                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                                    ____________                                                        
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                    ____________                                                        
                      Ex parte ALEX K. RAITH, RAJARAM RAMESH, R. DAVID KOILPILLAI,                                      
                             GREGORY E. BOTTOMLEY, and HAVISH KOORAPATY                                                 
                                                    ____________                                                        
                                                Appeal No. 2002-2179                                                    
                                             Application No. 08/839,861                                                 
                                                    ____________                                                        
                                                      ON BRIEF                                                          
                                                    ____________                                                        
              Before KRASS, BARRY, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges.                                       
              BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                 




                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       
                     This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final                       
              rejection of claims 5, 10, 12, and 13.                                                                    
                     We affirm-in-part.                                                                                 













Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007