Appeal No. 2002-2258
Application No. 09/134,977
in accordance with our previous discussion of these references
individually, that can be found among their collective teachings
and showings to have rendered obvious the subject matter of each
independent claim 15, 21 and 27 on appeal. Thus, this rejection
as well is reversed.
In summary, we have reversed each of the examiner’s stated
rejections of the claims on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 102 and
35 U.S.C. § 103. Therefore, the decision of the examiner is
reversed.
REVERSED
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JOSEPH L. DIXON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JDT:svt
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007