Ex Parte PALASKAS et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2002-2276                                                          
          Application No. 09/472,702                                                    


          The current output is compared with the reference current to                  
          produce a current difference or error.  The feedback loop is                  
          utilized to set the transconductance of the transconductor to a               
          value proportional to the ratio of the reference current and the              
          reference voltage.                                                            
               Claim 1 is illustrative of the invention and reads as                    
          follows:                                                                      
                    1.  A transconductance-setting and maintenance circuit,             
                    comprising:                                                         
                    a reference voltage source having positive and negative             
                    terminals;                                                          
                    a first transconductor coupled to said reference                    
                    voltage and producing a current output;                             
                    a reference current source coupled to said first                    
                    transconductor, and                                                 
                    a feedback loop coupled to said first transconductor                
               and said reference current source, said feedback loop                    
               reducing error in said current output and setting the                    
               transconductance of said first transconductor to a value                 
               proportional to the ratio of said reference current and said             
               reference voltage.                                                       
               The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                          
          Chambers et al. (Chambers)     5,530,399            Jun. 25, 1996             
          Luo                            6,111,467            Aug. 29, 2000             
                                                   (filed May  04, 1998)                
               Claims 1, 11, 12, 20, and 21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.              
          § 102(b) as being anticipated by Chambers.  Claims 2-4 stand                  

                                           2                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007