The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte LOTFI BENMOHAMED,
SUBRAHMANYAM DRAVIDA,
PARAMASIVIAH HARSHAVARDHANA,
WING CHEONG LAU
and
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL
__________
Appeal No. 2002-2288
Application No. 09/198,727
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before LEE, MOORE, and POTEATE, Administrative Patent Judges.
MOORE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 1-42, which are all of the pending claims.
The appellants have indicated (Brief, page 3) that, for the
purposes of this appeal, the claims will stand or fall together.
Consistent with this indication, Appellant has made no separate
arguments with respect to the remaining claims. Accordingly, all
the claims will stand or fall together, and we will select claim
XX, the broadest independent claim as representative of all of the
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007