The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 30
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte FRANCISCUS L. A. J. KAMPERMAN
and FRANK BOSVELD
____________
Appeal No. 2002-2289
Application No. 08/851,304
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before RUGGIERO, DIXON, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of
claims 2-7, which are all of the claims pending in the present
application. Claim 1 has been canceled. At page 2 of the Answer,
the Examiner indicates that claim 3 is allowed. Accordingly, only
the Examiner’s rejection of claims 2 and 4-7 is before us on
appeal.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007