Ex Parte Reddy et al - Page 2

            Appeal No. 2002-2318                                                      
            Application 09/652,520                                                    
            level has more descendants than the threshold value, a data               
            measure is aggregated for all descendants of the member and               
            stored with the member.                                                   
                 Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                     
                 1.  In a multidimensional database in which data is                  
            provided in hierarchical levels, a method comprising the                  
            steps of:                                                                 
                 setting a threshold value for a selected level of the                
            multidimensional database;                                                
                 for each member of the selected level that has more                  
            descendants than the level threshold value, aggregating a                 
            data measure for all descendants of the member, and storing               
            the aggregated value with the member.                                     

                 The examiner relies on the following references:                     
            Pirolli et al. (Pirolli)       5,835,905      Nov. 10, 1998               
            Pouschine et al. (Pouschine) 5,918,232        Jun. 29, 1999               

                 Claims 1-18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                  
            being unpatentable over the teachings of Pouschine in view                
            of Pirolli.                                                               
                 Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the                
            examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for              
            the respective details thereof.                                           

                                       OPINION                                        
                 We have carefully considered the subject matter on                   
            appeal, the rejection advanced by the examiner, and the                   
            evidence of obviousness relied upon by the examiner as                    
            support for the rejection.  We have, likewise, reviewed and               

                                         -2-                                          


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007