Ex Parte BOICE et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2003-0023                                                        
          Application No. 09/046,289                                                  



               Claim 26 is illustrative of the invention and reads as                 
          follows:                                                                    
                    26.  Apparatus for expanding the size of a search                 
               window of a motion estimator when encoding a sequence of               
               digitized video frames, comprising:                                    
                    one or more chip encoders, wherein the number of                  
               encoders is selected and defined by a user based upon the              
               expanded size of the search window;                                    
                    wherein each encoder comprises,                                   
                    a search unit to provide a coarse search to be used in            
               the motion estimation process,                                         
                    a search interface unit for comparing computed search             
               results with search results from other encoders and                    
               selecting the best result,                                             
                    an intra unit for providing a base encoder function,              
                    a search refine unit to provide a refined search around           
               the search results from the search unit, and                           
                    a clock unit;                                                     
                    wherein the intra unit and the search refine unit can             
               be made inoperable by control logic in the clock unit.                 

               The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                        
          Tayama                        5,680,181           Oct. 21, 1997             
          Jeng et al. (Jeng)            6,011,870           Jan. 04, 2000             
                                                  (filed Jul. 18, 1997)               
               Claims 26-45, all of the appealed claims, stand finally                
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)as being unpatentable over                 
          Tayama in view of Jeng.                                                     
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007