Appeal No. 2003-0031 Application No. 09/240,176 least one of the buffers 770-778 while each of channels 1, 2, and 3 is able to only read from at least one the buffers 770-778. In addressing the language of claims 12, 13, 15, the Examiner again relies on the interpretation of Osborne that suggests that, since the same buffer can store and retrieve data at different times, the claimed limitations are satisfied. Similar to our earlier discussion, we do not see any reasonable interpretation of Osborne that would support the conclusion that, merely because a single buffer may be used to store and retrieve data at different times, a limitation that restricts particular channels to a read or a write operation to at least one of a plurality of buffers would be met. 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007