The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SAN YU PHOENIX, KALPANA SHYAM,
JAMES ZU-CHIA TENG, JULIE ANN WATTS
and JAY A. YOTHERS
____________
Appeal No. 2003-0032
Application No. 09/193,9661
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, KRASS and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the Examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1-4, 6-25, 27-46 and 48-63. The Examiner has
objected to claims 5, 26 and 47 and has indicated their
allowability if rewritten in independent form including all of
the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims.
We reverse.
1 Application for patent filed November 18, 1998.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007