Appeal No. 2003-0048 Page 7
Application No. 09/163,787
performing a basic function, retrieve from the list data specifying whether a peripheral
performs an additional function, and examine the retrieved data to identify peripherals
performing the additional function, we are unpersuaded of a prima facie case of
obviousness. Therefore, we reverse the obviousness rejection of claim 1; of claims 2-5,
11, and 12, which depend therefrom; of claim 6; and of claims 7-10, which depend
therefrom.
CONCLUSION
In summary, the rejection of claims 1-12 under § 103(a) is reversed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007