Ex Parte YAMANAKA et al - Page 9




          Appeal No. 2003-0121                                                        
          Application No. 09/143,318                                                  


          guidance by the examiner as to the specific portions thereof                
          relied on by the examiner, looking for teachings and suggestions            
          of the instant claimed subject matter, all the while speculating            
          as to the examiner’s rationale.  The Board’s function is, inter             
          alia, to review examiners’ rejections and determine the propriety           
          of those rejections.  In the instant case, it is clear to us that           
          the examiner has not met the initial burden of establishing a               
          prima facie case of obviousness since there is no indication in             
          the rejection, or rationale therefor, how, exactly, the cited               
          references are being applied to meet, or suggest, the specific              
          language of the instant claims.                                             



















                                         -9–                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007