Appeal No. 2003-0186
Application No. 09/033,529
arbitrating between the expedite and non-expedite requests;
and
processing the non-expedite requests for a guaranteed
number of clock cycles in the monitoring window.
References
Barnaby et al. 6,006,303 Dec. 21, 1999
Horan et al. 5,936,640 Aug. 10, 1999
Hogg et al. 5,463,624 Oct. 31, 1995
Rejections at Issue
Claims 1, 3 and 4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being
anticipated by Barnaby et al. Claim 2 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being obvious over Barnaby et al. in view of Horan et al. Claims 5, 6, 15-21 and
29-35 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being obvious over Barnaby et al.
in view of Hogg et al. Claims 22-25, 36-39 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being obvious over Barnaby et al. in view of Hogg et al. and Horan et
al. Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the examiner we make
reference to the appeal brief and the examiner’s answer for the respective
details thereof.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007