Appeal No. 2003-0193
Application 09/306,469
recognition table, 3) a voice macro command file linked to the at
least one stored recognition pattern is sent to the camera, 4) at
least one command number from the voice macro command file is
accessed within the camera, 5) a matching command number is found
in a voice command recognition table, and 6) a voice command file
linked to the matching command number is retrieved from the voice
command recognition table.
The examiner relies upon Brais’ column 14, lines 14-15 for a
disclosure of command macros (answer, page 4). This portion of
Brais, however, discloses a pseudo command file, which may be a
Word® macro, which is parsed to construct a report. The macro is
not involved in controlling the camera.
The examiner argues that Brais’ camera necessarily has a
built-in controller for executing the recognized commands from
the computer (answer, page 10). Even if this is correct, the
appellant’s claim 1 requires that a voice macro command file is
sent to the capture device, at least one command number is
accessed from the voice macro command file within the capture
device, a matching command number is found in a voice command
recognition table, and a voice command file linked to the
matching command number is retrieved from the voice command
recognition table. The examiner does not explain how Brais would
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007