Ex Parte YAMAGUCHI - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-0266                                                        
          Application No. 09/072,553                                                  


               Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it               
          reads as follows:                                                           
               1.  An image processing method, comprising the steps of:               
               exposing a calibration pattern outside an image exposure               
          area of a photosensitive material for photographing;                        
               exposing an image inside the image exposure area to form a             
          continuous tone image;                                                      
               developing the exposed image and the exposed calibration               
          pattern;                                                                    
               digitally reading a formed image and the calibration pattern           
          in substantially a same manner after development processing and             
          creating digital image data and digital calibration pattern data;           
          and                                                                         
               using the created digital calibration pattern data,                    
          correcting the digital image data.                                          
               The references relied on by the examiner are:                          
          Thurm et al. (Thurm)     4,274,732                June 23, 1981             
          Sachs                    5,483,259                Jan.  9, 1996             
          Itoh et al. (Itoh)       5,696,576                Dec.  9, 1997             
          Inoue                    5,731,884                Mar. 24, 1998             
               Claims 1 through 3, 7, 11 through 13 and 18 through 20 stand           
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over                
          Thurm in view of Inoue.                                                     
               Claims 4 through 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)             
          as being unpatentable over Thurm in view of Inoue and Sachs.                
               Claims 8 through 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)            
          as being unpatentable over Thurm in view of Inoue and Itoh.                 

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007