Ex Parte Pels et al - Page 8




              Appeal No. 2003-0271                                                                  Page 8                
              Application No. 09/592,058                                                                                  


              Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Third Edition, (1992) defines "circuit                         
              board" as "[a]n insulated board on which interconnected circuits and components such                        
              as microchips are mounted or etched" and defines "circuit" as "[a] configuration of                         
              electrically or electromagnetically connected components or devices."  With these                           
              definitions, it is our determination that the claimed second circuit board of claims 1 and                  
              10 and the circuit board of claim 15 are readable on Weidler's dielectric member 61 on                      
              which interconnected conductive sheets 62, 63 and capacitors 72 (which constitute                           
              circuits) are mounted.  Lastly, we agree with the examiner that Weidler's capacitive                        
              coupling assembly 60 which blocks passage of low frequency current will inherently                          
              provide a galvanically isolated high frequency coupling between the conductive shell 14                     
              of the connector 10 and the conductive panel 4.                                                             


                     For the reasons set forth above, claims 1, 10 and 15 are anticipated by Weidler.                     
              Accordingly, the decision of the examiner to reject independent claims 1, 10 and 15                         
              under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) is affirmed.  The appellants have grouped claims 1 to 20 as                        
              standing or falling together.2  Thereby, in accordance with 37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7), claims                    
              2, 4 to 7, 9, 12 to 14, 16 to 18 and 20 fall with claims 1, 10 and 15.  Thus, it follows that               
              the decision of the examiner to reject claims 2, 4 to 7, 9, 12 to 14, 16 to 18 and 20 under                 
              35 U.S.C. § 102(e) is also affirmed.                                                                        

                     2 See page 4 of the appellants' brief.                                                               







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007