Ex Parte CORSTON et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2003-0277                                                        
          Application No. 09/097,979                                                  

          through 9, 11, 12, 17 through 31, 36 through 50, 52 through 55, 61          
          through 70, 72, 73, 75 through 78 and 80 are the only claims before         
          us on appeal1.                                                              
               The disclosed invention determines the similarity between              
          first and second textual inputs by creating first and second sets           
          of logical forms based on the first and the second textual inputs,          
          respectively, and then comparing the first and second sets of               
          logical forms.                                                              
               Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads         
          as follows:                                                                 
          1.   A method of determining similarity between first and second            
          textual inputs, the method comprising:                                      
               obtaining a first set of logical forms based on the first              
          textual input;                                                              
               obtaining a second set of logical forms based on the second            
          textual input;                                                              
               comparing the first and second sets of logical forms; and              
               determining similarity between the first and second textual            
          inputs based on the step of comparing.                                      




               1 Although claims 56 through 60 may still be pending in this           
          application (supplemental answer, page 4), the appellants did not           
          list them as claims on appeal (brief, page 2).                              
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007