Appeal No. 2003-0288
Application No. 09/107,920
Claims 1, 3, 4, 18 and 23 through 28 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Cyman in view of
Maruyama.
Claims 8, 10 and 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
as being unpatentable over Cyman in view of Maruyama and Edmunds.
Claim 15 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Cyman in view of Maruyama and Matsuo.
Claim 6 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Cyman in view of Maruyama and Gentile.
Claim 13 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Cyman in view of Maruyama, Edmunds and Gentile
Claim 17 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Cyman in view of Maruyama, Matsuo and Gentile.
Claims 19 through 221 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Cyman in view of Maruyama and
King.
1 Although claim 22 is not among the listed claims (paper
number 21, page 15), it is discussed in the statement of the
rejection (paper number 21, page 17).
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007