Ex Parte LADABAUM - Page 1



          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                            Paper No. 21              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                               Ex parte IGAL LADABAUM                                 
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2003-0295                                  
                               Application 09/435,324                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before OWENS, JEFFREY SMITH and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative                 
          Patent Judges.                                                              
          OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 33-56,               
          which are all of the claims pending in the application.                     
                                    THE INVENTION                                     
               The appellant claims a semiconductor transducer having,                
          between transducers in an array of transducers, an acoustic                 



                                          1                                           




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007