Ex Parte RHODES - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2003-0333                                                        
          Application No. 09/231,041                                                  

          Representative claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                            
               1.  In a computer system of the type wherein a processor               
          directs information to and retrieves information from a memory              
          which includes main memory and cache memory, the improvement                
          comprising:                                                                 
               a plurality of separate and independent memory branches                
          extend from a common bus that passes at a hierarchical level                
          immediately above the processor and a combination of main memory            
          and cache memory is included in each branch, with at least one              
          branch having at least one hierarchical level of multiple cache             
          memory units in a memory space division.                                    
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Menasce                       5,193,166          Mar. 09, 1993              
          Mattson                       5,434,992          July 18, 1995              
          Smith                         5,696,932          Dec. 09, 1997              
          Handy, Jim, The Cache Memory Book (New York, Academic Press,                
          Inc., 1933), pages 87-91.                                                   
          The following rejections are on appeal before us:                           
          1. Claims 1 and 2 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)                   
          as being unpatentable over the teachings of Menasce in view of              
          Smith.                                                                      
          2. Claim 3 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                      
          being unpatentable over the teachings of Menasce in view of Smith           
          and further in view of Handy.                                               
          3. Claims 5 and 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)                   
          as being unpatentable over the teachings of Menasce in view of              
          Smith and further in view of Mattson.                                       

                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007