Ex Parte PAPIERNIAK et al - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today was not written for publication and is not                       
               binding precedent of the Board.                                        
                                                       Paper No. 26                   

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                  ________________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                  ________________                                    
                            Ex parte KAREN A. PAPIERNIAK                              
                                 and LUO-JEN CHIANG                                   
                                  ________________                                    
                                Appeal No. 2003-0342                                  
                               Application 09/040,919                                 
                                  ________________                                    
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                  ________________                                    
          Before JERRY SMITH, BARRY and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.           
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
                                                                                     
                                                                                     
          This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                      
          from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 2 and 4-13, which                
          constitute all the claims in the application.                               





                                         -1-                                          





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007