Appeal No. 2003-0351
Application 09/436,421
Claims 1-4, 6-10, 12, 19 and 20 stand rejected under 35
U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by the disclosure of Hunt.
Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the
examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for the
respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on
appeal, the rejection advanced by the examiner and the evidence
of anticipation relied upon by the examiner as support for the
rejection. We have, likewise, reviewed and taken into
consideration, in reaching our decision, the appellants’
arguments set forth in the briefs along with the examiner’s
rationale in support of the rejection and arguments in rebuttal
set forth in the examiner’s answer.
It is our view, after consideration of the record before
us, that the evidence relied upon supports the examiner’s
rejection. Accordingly, we affirm.
Appellants have indicated that for purposes of this
appeal the claims will all stand or fall together as a single
group [brief, page 4]. Consistent with this indication
appellants have made no separate arguments with respect to any of
the claims on appeal. Accordingly, all the claims before us will
-3-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007