Ex Parte COOPER et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2003-0355                                                        
          Application No. 09/217,725                                                  
                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               Appellants’ invention relates to generating item menu lists            
          for use during operation of a self-service checkout terminal                
          which allow a customer to quickly and efficiently find an item              
          name in an item list of a selection menu.                                   
               Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced as follows:           
                    1.  A method of displaying an item name having a first            
               word and a second word on an item list of an item selection            
               menu of a retail terminal, comprising the steps of:                    
                    displaying a first version of said item name on said              
               item list of said item selection menu such that said first             
               word is followed by said second word; and                              
                    displaying a second version of said item name on said             
               item list of said item selection menu such that said second            
               word is followed by said first word.                                   
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          Examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
               Humble              4,964,053           Oct. 16, 1990                  
               Walter              5,987,428           Nov. 16, 1999                  
                                            (filed Jun. 25, 1996)                    
               Claims 1-17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being           
          unpatentable over Walter in view of Humble.                                 
               We make reference to the answer (Paper No. 11, mailed August           
          20, 2002) for the Examiner’s reasoning, and to the brief (Paper             
          No. 10, filed June 7, 2002) and the reply brief (Paper No. 12,              
          filed October 28, 2002) for Appellants’ arguments thereagainst.             
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007