Appeal No. 2003-0408 Application 09/019,965 Therefore, we do not sustain the examiner’s rejection of claims 15 and 17-19 for the same reasons discussed above with respect to claim 1. In summary, we have not sustained either of the examiner’s rejections of the claims on appeal. Therefore, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1-5, 8-12, 15, 17-19, 27 and 29 is reversed. REVERSED JERRY SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT JOESPH F. RUGGIERO ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) JOSEPH L. DIXON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) JS:dym 10Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007