Appeal No. 2003-0428
Application 09/116,564
document is first copied into a new HTML page on the local hard
drive. The original page is then parsed to prepare a list
hypertext references. For each reference tag in the base HTML
document, a copy of the file is retrieved on the server and then
saved on the local hard drive. See Mantha, column 2, lines 22
through 44. A more detailed description of the operation is
provided in columns 9 and 10 of Mantha. There, Mantha teaches
that the references are changed to reflect the local storage
system addressing. See Mantha, column 9, line 58, through column
10, line 7. Thus, Mantha does not teach a reference locator that
references a target location for an address determinator that
identifies a second reference. This is because Mantha has no
need to do so since the Web page is being saved as a local Cache.
Now the question before us, is there any suggestion in
Mantha to make the suggested modifications proposed by the
Examiner. Upon our review of the entire reference, we fail to
find that Mantha provides any suggestion or even hint of making
such a modification. As pointed out above, Mantha is concerned
with providing a simple technique to take a snap shot of a
particular Web page. Mantha proposed a simple solution by simply
providing a copy of the Web page on the client local hard drive
disk. With this simple technique, there is no need to determine
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007