Ex Parte KLEMM et al - Page 2


          Appeal No. 2003-0434                                                        
          Application No. 09/277,954                                                  

               Claim 1 is the only independent claim on appeal, and it                
          reads as follows:                                                           
               1.  A method for character recognition for a character                 
          recognition system having a reading memory, a working memory, an            
          entry device and a recognition device, with said method including           
          the steps of: storing a dataset of memory character sequences in            
          the reading memory; transferring the character sequences from the           
          reading memory into the working memory in a serial manner; in the           
          recognition device, deriving an association of an entered-                  
          character sequence provided by the entry device with one of the             
          transmitted memory character sequences by the linking of the                
          supplied entered-character sequence with the contents of the                
          working memory; and, wherein the stored character sequences are             
          represented in a hierarchical branched structure having a                   
          plurality of branch levels, and, said step of transferring the              
          character sequence data of the dataset includes transmitting the            
          partial data of successive structural branch levels one after               
          another over time, and causing the recognition device to already            
          receive the possible linking of a possibly-present entered-                 
          character sequence having the still-incomplete contents of the              
          working memory before the transfer of the entire dataset is                 
          complete.                                                                   
               The references relied on by the examiner are:                          
          Nozaki et al. (Nozaki)   5,835,635           Nov. 10, 1998                  
          Yoshii et al. (Yoshii)   5,982,933           Nov.  9, 1999                  
                                             (filed Dec. 31, 1996)                    
               Claims 1 through 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e)             
          as being anticipated by Nozaki.                                             
               Claims 9 and 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as             
          being unpatentable over Nozaki in view of Yoshii.                           
               Reference is made to the briefs (paper numbers 12 and 14)              
          and the answer (paper number 13) for the respective positions of            
          the appellants and the examiner.                                            
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007