The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 17 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JAMES W. CADDELL JR. and JAMES M. CALDWELL ____________ Appeal No. 2003-0455 Application No. 09/438,969 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before COHEN, STAAB, and MCQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges. STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-18. An amendment after final rejection (Paper No. 10, filed January 31, 2002) canceling claims 19-21 has been approved for entry.1 No other claims are currently pending. 1Although the examiner stated in an advisory action (Paper No. 11, mailed January 31, 2002) that the amendment after final would be entered for purposes of appeal, no clerical entry of this amendment has in fact been made.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007