Ex Parte Morris - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today             
               was not written for publication and is not binding precedent           
               of the Board.                                                          
                                                            Paper No. 12              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                               Ex parte JOHN L. MORRIS                                
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2003-0458                                  
                             Application No. 09/894,738                               
                                     __________                                       
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     __________                                       

          Before KIMLIN, GARRIS, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal from the refusal of the                
          examiner to allow claims 1, 3, 6, 8 and 9 as amended subsequent             
          to the final rejection.  These are all of the claims remaining in           
          the application.                                                            
               The subject matter on appeal relates to a device for driving           
          eyebolts and hooks.  With reference to the appellant’s drawing,             

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007