Ex Parte PEELE - Page 11




                 Appeal No. 2003-0469                                                                                 
                 Application No. 09/317,480                                                                           

                 between sectors of a cell based upon channel use.  Further, as addressed infra,                      
                 we find that as the examiner argues, any divergence between the fixed allocation                     
                 teaching of Yu and the transferring of assignment as claimed is mitigated by the                     
                 teachings of Benveniste.  Accordingly, we do not find that Yu teaches away from                      
                 transferring channels between sectors of a cell based upon channel                                   
                 use, rather we find that Yu does not contemplate a scenario where transferring                       
                 channels between sectors of a cell based upon channel use is necessary and                           
                 leaves the door open for further adjustment of the frequency assignment.                             
                        Appellant argues, on pages 6 through 8 of the brief, that the examiner has                    
                 improperly relied upon the Yu, that the examiner picked and chose among the                          
                 isolated disclosures of Yu and that the examiner should have considered the                          
                 teachings of Yu as a whole.  Appellant agues, on page 8 of the brief, that                           
                               When considered as a whole, Yu teaches constructing call sector                        
                        boundaries that accurately reflect real-world performance characteristics,                    
                        followed by a precise allocation of specific channel groups to each sector                    
                        according to a complex algorithm to optimize performance in each region.                      
                        Yu expresses no concern for co-channel interference, for the relative                         
                        loading among sectors or for spectral efficiency.  The complexity and                         
                        computational intensity of Yu’s sector channel allocation algorithm dispel                    
                        any notation that Yu envisioned, contemplated or could possibly                               
                        implement the dynamic allocation of channels among sectors on an as-                          
                        needed basis.  In short, Yu teaches away from Applicant’s invention.                          
                 The examiner responds to these arguments, on page 10 of the answer, by                               
                 asserting that Yu does not “teach away” and stating:                                                 
                        Yu states that co-channel (channel to channel) interference is a limiting                     
                        factor in the number of channels available in a system and is the chief                       
                        reason for implementing the cellular and frequency reuse concepts.  Thus                      

                                                         11                                                           



Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007