The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte KENNETH R. LABOUNTY, ROSS D. CHRISTENSON,
and DANIEL P. JACOBSON
_____________
Appeal No. 2003-0510
Application No. 09/524,904
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1-12, 14-17, 19 and 20, all the claims
currently pending in the application.
Appellants’ invention pertains to a heavy duty demolition
apparatus having a replaceable tip. An understanding of the
invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1,
which appears in the appendix to appellants’ main brief.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007