Appeal No. 2003-0527 Page 6
Application No. 09/036,291
the magnitude of a bonding current, generating an output voltage signal having a
magnitude that represents the ongoing total amount of charge that has been furnished
for bonding, and halting the flow of the bonding current when the ongoing total amount
of charge exceeds a predetermined threshold.
2. ANTICIPATION AND OBVIOUSNESS DETERMINATIONS
"Having construed the claim limitations at issue, we now compare the claims to
the prior art to determine if the prior art anticipates those claims." In re Cruciferous
Sprout Litig., 301 F.3d 1343, 1349, 64 USPQ2d 1202, 1206 (Fed. Cir. 2002). "A claim
is anticipated only if each and every element as set forth in the claim is found, either
expressly or inherently described, in a single prior art reference." Verdegaal Bros., Inc.
v. Union Oil Co., 814 F.2d 628, 631, 2 USPQ2d 1051, 1053 (Fed. Cir. 1987) (citing
Structural Rubber Prods. Co. v. Park Rubber Co., 749 F.2d 707, 715, 223 USPQ 1264,
1270 (Fed. Cir. 1984); Connell v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 722 F.2d 1542, 1548, 220
USPQ 193, 198 (Fed. Cir. 1983); Kalman v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., 713 F.2d760, 771,
218 USPQ 781, 789 (Fed. Cir. 1983)). "[A]bsence from the reference of any claimed
element negates anticipation." Kloster Speedsteel AB v. Crucible, Inc., 793 F.2d 1565,
1571, 230 USPQ 81, 84 (Fed. Cir. 1986).
Here, Okuda "join[s] two ceramic bodies in a large size or in a complicated shape
by heating electrically a butted portion to be jointed. . . ." Col. 1, ll. 15-17. More
specifically, "[t]wo ceramic bodies in a pipe form are connected with butted portion to be
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007