Appeal No. 2003-0593
Application 08/329,345
given news item of said plurality of news items being defined
by a respective beginning and ending of said given news item;
generating a time advanced text data stream in digital form
substantially corresponding to the spoken words of said audio
portion of said composite video signal, said time advanced text
data stream being advanced in time so that substantially all of
said time advanced test data stream in digital form corresponding
to said given news item is generated before the beginning of said
given news items; and
combining said generated composite video signal and said
time advanced text data stream.
The following references are relied on by the examiner:
Baer 4,310,854 Jan. 12, 1992
Young 4,706,121 Nov. 10, 1987
Kim 5,526,130 June 11, 1996
(filing date Sep. 7, 1993)
All above-noted claims finally rejected stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103. As evidence of obviousness as to claims 33-35,
38-41, 43-46, 49-51, 54-57, 59-62 and 64, the examiner relies
upon Kim in view of Baer. As to claims 33-35, 38, 49-51 and 54,
the examiner also relies upon Young in view of Baer.
Rather than repeat the positions of the appellant and the
examiner, reference is made to the brief and answer for the
respective details thereof.
OPINION
Generally, for the reasons set forth by appellant in the
brief, we reverse the rejection of all claims on appeal.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007