Appeal No. 2003-0670 Application No. 09/119,891 teaching of this specific claim limitation. This portion of Wood discloses renderers and a z-buffer algorithm being used to deduce the nearest visible rendering primitive at each pixel. This rendering technique of Wood may cause the generation of differing views, but there is no indication therein that it performs this function by obtaining data defining at least the lenticular screen lenticule pitch, the number of views N, and the lenticular screen position relative to the display device pixels and then applying a predetermined algorithm, using this obtained data, to determine which of N views is to be carried. In response to appellant’s argument that Wood does not disclose this claimed limitation, the examiner argues that column 1, lines 18-24, and column 2, lines 58-67, of Wood teach obtaining data defining the lenticular screen lenticules pitch, i.e., the horizontal diameter of each lenticule, as this represents the lenticule pitch (see page 7 of the answer). We have reviewed the cited portions of Wood and we fail to find any disclosure therein of obtaining data defining at least the lenticular screen lenticule pitch, the number of views N, and the lenticular screen position relative to the display device pixels, wherein this data is applied to a predetermined algorithm for determining which of N views is to be carried. -4–Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007