Appeal No. 2003-0781
Application 09/373,499
We now consider the examiner’s rejection of claims 8-20,
26-33 and 39-46 based on Otala, Morcos and Anderson. These
claims are all dependent claims which depend from one of claims
1, 21 or 34. Anderson is apparently only cited to teach various
image file formats. There is no suggestion by the examiner on
this record that Anderson overcomes the deficiencies of the main
combination of references discussed above with respect to
claim 1. Therefore, the evidence to support this rejection
suffers the same deficiencies we discussed above. Accordingly,
we also do not sustain the examiner’s rejection of claims 8-20,
26-33 and 39-46.
-8-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007